A
new survey by the New York Times found that states without the
death penalty have lower homicide rates than states with the death
penalty. The Times reports that ten of the twelve states without
the death penalty have homicide rates below the national average,
whereas half of the states with the death penalty have homicide
rates above. During the last 20 years, the homicide rate in states
with the death penalty has been 48% - 101% higher than in states
without the death penalty. "I think Michigan made a wise
decision 150 years ago," said the state's governor, John
Engler, a Republican, referring to the state's abolition of the
death penalty in 1846. "We're pretty proud of the fact that
we don't have the death penalty." (New York Times, 9/22/00)
See also, states with and without the death penalty
, murder
rates by state 1995-1998, and deterrence.
A
Story of Mental Retardation and the Death Penalty; Accomplice
Served Less than 6 Years Lorenza Norwood, whose IQ measures in the
60s, was sentenced to death for the murder of a convenience store
clerk in 1993 in North Carolina. Norwood's accomplice, Herbert
Joyner, refused to talk to the police, hired his own lawyer,
accepted a plea, and was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment, of
which he served less than six. Norwood, on the other hand, was
defended by court-appointed attorneys after having already talked
to the police.
Norwood was born two months pre-mature. He failed the first grade.
When he was 30, he was out of work. When he came up 20 cents short
in buying a bottle of wine, he got into an argument with a store
clerk. The clerk hit him with a baseball bat and chased him from
the store. Later, Norwood returned to the store with Joyner, a man
with a long criminal record who urged Norwood to take revenge. The
clerk died from a fire started by Norwood and Joyner.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty should be
reserved for the most heinous crimes and the most culpable
criminals. "To permit the execution of a person with mental
retardation," says Jim Ellis, a national expert on mental
retardation and a professor at the University of New Mexico,
"requires concluding that such an individual is both in the
bottom 2 percent of the population in intelligence and also in the
top 1 or 2 percent of the population in his appreciation and
understanding of the wrongfulness of his actions." (Charlotte
Observer, 9/14/00) |