Tainted
Justice
By
BOB HERBERT
Texas
has always had a brutally peculiar take on what constitutes justice. A
veteran Dallas defense lawyer, reminiscing last year, said, "At one
point, with a black-on-black murder, you could get it dismissed if the
defendant would pay funeral expenses."
A
prominent judge, looking back to his days as a prosecutor in the 1950's,
remembered an angry boss telling him, "If you ever put another nigger
on a jury, you're fired."
A
judge in Harris County, reacting to complaints about a defense lawyer
sleeping during a capital murder trial, acknowledged that defendants were
entitled to a lawyer, but added, "The Constitution doesn't say the
lawyer has to be awake."
Those
quotes were drawn from a major study last year of the death penalty in
Texas. The whole world knows that Texas has a fetish for executing people.
Nothing stops the Lone Star Executioner. There may be uncertainty as to
guilt. The condemned may be mentally retarded. The defense lawyer may have
been drunk or drug-addicted or wildly incompetent. The jury may have been
rabidly racist. No matter. The conveyor belt of death in Huntsville, the
state's execution headquarters, maintains its steady, mindless pace.
Napoleon
Beazley is to be placed upon that belt next week. The crime he was
convicted of was bad enough, for sure. He killed a man in cold blood, shot
at the man's wife and stole their car.
But
the death penalty is always problematic. And there are some issues in the
Beazley case that are very troubling. The victim's son is a federal judge
from Virginia who forged a remarkably close relationship with the
prosecution as it built its case for the death of Mr. Beazley.
All
of the jurors, like the prosecutors and the judge, were white. Mr. Beazley
is black. One of the jurors was the president of the United Daughters of
the Confederacy. Another juror, when contacted by a defense investigator
during the appeals process, was heard to say, "The nigger got what he
deserved." That juror's wife gave the defense team an affidavit that
said her husband was "racially prejudiced" and that she found it
difficult to believe he could have "set his prejudice aside" for
Mr. Beazley's trial.
Mr.
Beazley's lawyer, Walter Long, said the juror was an appliance repairman
who, according to a co-worker, would refuse to work on appliances brought
in by black customers.
It's
hard to imagine how a fair trial could have been harvested from such
bitterly racist soil.
That's
Texas for you. The death- penalty system in the foremost death- penalty
state in the U.S. is monumentally racist. When a black person kills a
white person in Texas, authorities are quick to put the machinery of
capital punishment in gear. And, as in the Beazley case, black people are
routinely excluded from the judgment process. But it's a different story
when a white person kills a black person. The death penalty study, by the
Texas Defender Service, which represents indigent inmates on death row,
noted that "Texas has never executed a white person for the murder of
a black person."
The
study found that "across the state, the loss of non-white lives is
treated less seriously than the loss of white lives."
Apart
from all of these issues is yet another problem with the Beazley case. The
defendant was a minor � 17 years old � when the crime was committed in
1994. Most of the countries of the world prohibit the execution of
prisoners who were juveniles when the offense was committed.
According
to Amnesty International, "Of the thousands of judicial executions
documented worldwide in the past decade, only 25 have been of prisoners
who were under 18 at the time of the crime. Of these 25, more than half
� 13 � were carried out in the United States." Seven of those
executions were done in Texas.
As
a society, we should have some sense of the immaturity, the impulsiveness
and the frequently appalling lack of judgment that are so often part of
the teenage years. They are not defenses for murder. But they are reasons
for us to withhold the ultimate punishment from offenders who were not
fully grown, and thus may not have been fully responsible for all of their
actions.
Napoleon
Beazley's life should be spared. Imprisonment for life is sufficient.
|