The
Sun
Inmate
fights death penalty - High court's ruling renders Md. statute
invalid, lawyer says; Constitutionality assailed; Use of argument
by more prisoners likely
By
Dennis O'Brien Sun Staff - Originally published March 12, 2001An
inmate on Maryland's death row who is expected to be executed this
year will raise an argument this month never before heard here:
that the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated the state's death penalty
law a year ago. Lawyers for Steven Howard Oken, sentenced in 1991,
plan to argue March 21 in Baltimore County Circuit Court that the
Supreme Court nullified Maryland's death penalty statute in June
when it struck down a New Jersey hate crime law. The high court
ruled in Apprendi vs. New Jersey that to increase a defendant's
prison sentence beyond the statutory maximum, as the hate crime
statute allowed, prosecutors must prove the existence of
aggravating factors beyond a reasonable doubt. Fred W. Bennett,
Oken's attorney, says Maryland's death penalty law fails to meet
that test because jurors use a lesser standard at sentencing. He
views capital punishment as an enhancement of the maximum sentence
for first-degree murder -- life without possibility of parole.
"We're attacking the constitutionality of the entire
death-sentencing scheme in Maryland," Bennett said. Bennett
said he also will use the Apprendi ruling before the Court of
Appeals on May 3 when he argues for a new trial for Lawrence
Borchardt, who was sentenced to death last spring for the killing
of an elderly Rosedale couple in 1998. But state lawyers say that
the Apprendi decision does not apply to Maryland's death penalty
law because it addressed only statutes -- such as hate crime
legislation -- that extend sentences beyond the maximum provided
for by law. They deny that the death penalty is an enhancement of
the established punishment for first-degree murder. "We're
not enhancing any penalties when we seek a death sentence. Death
is the maximum penalty in first-degree murder cases," said
Assistant State's Attorney S. Ann Brobst, who prosecuted Oken. The
Maryland General Assembly is reviewing a proposal to impose a
moratorium on executions until researchers at University of
Maryland complete a study on whether the death penalty is unfairly
imposed on African-Americans. The study was approved last year by
Gov. Parris N. Glendening. Thirteen inmates are on Maryland's
death row, said Assistant Attorney General Gary Bair. Bair, who
oversees the criminal appeals division, said Bennett would be the
first lawyer to raise the issue in the state appeals process since
the Apprendi decision was handed down. At least three other death
row inmates -- who like Oken have nearly exhausted their appeals
-- are expected to use Apprendi in similar arguments in the next
few months. The Supreme Court is expected to rule soon on
petitions seeking review filed by Anthony Grandison and Vernon
Evans, who were convicted of the April 28, 1983, murders of David
Scott Piechowicz and Susan Kennedy in Pikesville, legal experts
said. The Supreme Court denied Oken's petition for review last
month. The court also denied a petition two weeks ago filed by
Wesley Baker, who was convicted of the 1991 killing and robbery of
Jane Tyson at Westview Mall in Catonsville. "I would expect
all four of the defendants currently up for review will be raising
Apprendi-related issues," said Gary Christopher, a federal
public defender who represents Baker. The Apprendi case involves a
Vineland, N.J., man who was convicted of a gun violation for
shooting into the home of a black family that had moved into his
white neighborhood. The crime carried a 10-year maximum sentence.
But the judge found by a preponderance of the evidence that the
shooting was racially motivated and sentenced Apprendi to a
12-year term under the enhanced penalties provisions of New
Jersey's hate crime statute. The Supreme Court ruled that enhanced
penalties must be decided by a "reasonable doubt"
standard -- the toughest test in law. Bennett said that ruling
means jurors who sentenced Oken to death rather than to life in
prison in 1991 -- based upon a "preponderance of evidence"
standard -- used a standard that was "unconstitutionally low."
Bennett plans to request a new trial during a hearing before Judge
James T. Smith Jr. on March 21. He is scheduled to argue before
Judge Dana M. Levitz the same day that the state gave Oken
insufficient notice of the aggravating factors to be used against
him to seek a death sentence. Oken sexually assaulted and killed
Dawn Marie Garvin, a 20-year-old White Marsh newlywed, on Nov. 2,
1987. Two weeks later, he killed his wife's sister, Patricia A.
Hirt, 43, at his White Marsh townhouse. Oken fled to Kittery,
Maine, where he killed Lori E. Ward, 25, a motel clerk. He was
arrested Nov. 17, 1987, in Kittery and sentenced to life in prison
for the murder of Ward. - On Jan. 25, 1991, he was sentenced to
die in the gas chamber for the murder of Garvin. The next April,
he pleaded guilty to murdering Hirt and was given another life
sentence to be served concurrently with a life sentence he
received for sexually assaulting Garvin.
|