October
12, 2001
TV
WEEKEND - 'Shot in the Heart': Why, Big Brother, Why?
By
JULIE SALAMON
Since
the Supreme Court voted to reinstate capital punishment in 1976,
more than 730 people have been executed in the United States. While
some opponents of the death penalty work steadily for its repeal,
the executions have become part of life. They are grimly applauded
by many people and numbly ignored by others who object � but not
enough to take action or even pay much attention.
In
1977, however, a state-ordered killing riveted the nation. The death
sentence of Gary Mark Gilmore, the first man to be executed in the
United States in a decade, was major news, and Gilmore was a
glamorous subject. He was sexy, intelligent and eager to receive
retribution for murdering two men. Civil libertarians begged him to
appeal his death sentence, but he had no interest in being part of a
larger cause. Having spent 22 of his 36 years in prison, he was
ready to die.
Gilmore
gained mythological status in 1979 with the publication of "The
Executioner's Song," Norman Mailer's brilliant anthropological
vision of the case. Billed as a "true life" novel, the
book sprawled across an enormous landscape, whose imagery
encompassed a larger-than- life outlaw, his wild romance with a
young woman named Nicole, a media circus and the vastness and
divergence of America itself. This huge, vibrant work, which won a
Pulitzer Prize, made a legend of Gary Gilmore.
But
it took the outlaw's mild younger brother to bring a stark humanity
to Gary Gilmore's story. Mikal Gilmore went to college and became a
writer for Rolling Stone magazine. He wasn't interested so much in
what Gary meant to America but in how their family had come to
produce him. Yet it took Mikal Gilmore years after the execution to
feel strong enough to conduct his personal investigation. Finally,
in 1994, 17 years after his brother's death, he published a brave,
sorrowful memoir titled "Shot in the Heart."
Now
his book has been made into a bleak, haunting HBO movie. This
dramatic interpretation of "Shot in the Heart" takes place
almost entirely during the days before Gary Gilmore's execution,
interrupted by flashbacks to the family's past. A lawyer for the
American Civil Liberties Union has persuaded Mikal and another
brother, Frank Jr., to come to Utah's Draper Prison to convince Gary
to appeal his execution.
The
brothers have all been alienated for years and suspicious of one
another. They are conducting this wary reunion in the most hostile
circumstances imaginable � meeting inside a prison, surrounded by
guards while outside lurk strangers with an interest in the outcome
of their meeting. The A.C.L.U. lawyer is defending a principle that
requires Gary to live. A journalistic entrepreneur named Larry
Schiller has bought the rights to Gary's story, which is much more
valuable if he dies.
Mikal
approaches Gary with a confused desire for absolution and brotherly
love. Having gone a respectable route, Mikal wants nothing more than
to distance himself from the brother who has committed evil acts.
But as the runt of the Gilmore litter � much younger than his
three brothers � he desperately wants to reconcile with Gary.
Mikal suffers guilt by association in every direction. He's the
brother of a killer, yes, but he's also the favored son of the
father whose cruelty may have instigated Gary's criminal behavior.
The
director, Agnieszka Holland, and the screenwriter, Frank Pugliese,
have created a scenario that unflinchingly captures the feverish and
desperate intensity of Mikal's quest. Much of the film takes place
in prison, and these confined scenes have the naked intimacy of a
play. Mr. Mailer's "Executioner's Song" reflected the
storm around Gilmore; "Shot in the Heart" rests firmly in
the quiet dread of the eye.
The
casting is eerily right. Giovanni Ribisi, a slight, cherub-faced
man, perfectly conveys Mikal's rawness and defensiveness. His eyes
are red, as though he's just recovered from a crying jag � and you
have the impression the jag has gone on for years. In flashbacks he
appears like a little doll, cuddled by the same father who routinely
whacked his older brothers. As an adult, he retains the same
bewilderment he revealed as a child, not comprehending why he's
treated so differently from the brothers he adores.
Mikal
is still enthralled by Gary, and it's easy to see why. The older
brother carries himself like a prince. Even in prison he has style,
outfitted in all-white, showing off the red and blue shoelaces he
filched from someone. Even in his disgrace, Gary seems sure and
strangely noble, willing to accept punishment for his crimes,
arranging book deals to leave money behind for his loved ones. But
he's also cold as death. When Mikal asks him why he killed men he
didn't know, Gary says matter-of-factly, "It seemed
appropriate." Elias Koteas, who plays Gary, bears a strong
physical resemblance to the real Gilmore. His studied swaggering
charm and flashes of madness and tenderness suggest that the actor
has spent more than a few hours studying Robert De Niro films.
The
film makes it clear that the Gilmore brothers weren't part of just
another dysfunctional family but a repository of superstition,
mistrust and oddness that goes back generations. Their father (Sam
Shepard), seen only in flashbacks, was a cruel man with a soft spot
for MiKal and apparent disdain for everyone else. Bessie, the mother
(Amy Madigan), came from a Mormon family steeped in notions of
portent and divine retribution. Mikal hasn't had to separate from
his family; he's had to escape. Ms. Holland visually reinforces
Mikal's despairing sense of smallness and loneliness, emphasizing
the large Western spaces surrounding the Utah prison where he meets
with Gary. Harsh mountains loom in an endless sky. It's hard to find
your place in a place like that.
In this harrowing story redemption comes hard � if it
comes at all. For Gary Gilmore, living, not dying, was the
punishment he couldn't bear. "I don't want to die," he
says. "I just want to be free."
|