NOVEMBER
12
ASIA:
ASEAN:
Death penalty is not the answer
Amnesty
International today urged ASEAN countries meeting in Bali, Indonesia, not
to erode human rights protection by using the death penalty to fight drug
trafficking.
"The
concern within ASEAN about increasing drug addiction and drug- related
crimes is justifiable, yet there is compelling evidence of the futility
and injustice of trying to use the death penalty to suppress drug
trafficking and abuse," Amnesty International said.
"There
is no evidence, despite the high number of executions, that the death
penalty has been an effective tool in combatting the trafficking or abuse
of illegal drugs in South East Asia. The death penalty not only adds to
the terrible waste of life caused by use of illegal drugs, but also
carries the inherent risk of executing the innocent."
This
comes after recent statements by several member governments -- including
Indonesia, Thailand and Philippines -- which could point towards a
strategy of increased reliance on the death penalty to combat the illegal
drugs trade.
The
People's Republic of China will also be present as a donor country. A
large proportion of sentences and executions in China monitored by Amnesty
International each year include those relating to drug-related crimes.
China has an appalling record of executions: between April and June 2001,
Amnesty International recorded at least 2,960 death sentences and 1,781
executions. 9 out of the 10 member states of ASEAN have some provision in
law for the use of the death penalty for drug-related offences. Amnesty
International is worried that, on top of the already high rates of
executions for drug offences, recent statements and actions by some
governments may herald its increased use.
"Governments
often justify their use of the death penalty saying public opinion favours
it. However, no studies on the use of the death penalty have found that it
has a deterrent effect," Amnesty International said.
In
October 2001, the President of Indonesia, Megawati Sukarnoputri called for
the increased use of the death penalty for drug traffickers and drug
dealers. Amnesty International knows of thirteen people on death row
convicted of drug smuggling since January 2000.
In
particular, there is concern that the use of the death penalty is
especially dangerous when trials may be unfair. In September 2000, the
Indonesian National Human Rights Commission highlighted the case of Saka
bin Juma, who was allegedly tortured to extract a confession and denied
access to legal counsel before the trial. He is currently on death row and
has complained that he does not know how to access the appeals process.
"More
than half of the world's countries have abolished the death penalty in law
or practice," said Amnesty International. "Our hope now is that
governments in Southeast Asia will join that majority and demonstrate
respect for human life by ending all executions, including for drug
offences."
|