Radio Free Europe
/Halperin News
Debate
Over Death Penalty Threatens Council Of Europe Membership
Only
6 months after its hard-won accession to the Council of Europe, Armenia is
facing the possibility of being suspended from the respected human rights
organization over its stance on capital punishment. The country's largest
political parties, which last year made a unanimous pledge to abolish the
death penalty, are now demanding the execution of the perpetrators of the
October 1999 massacre in the Armenian parliament. 2 years ago, 5 gunmen
entered the Armenian parliament and sprayed the assembly with bullets,
killing the country's prime minister, parliament speaker, and 6 other
officials. The suspects in the incident have been on trial since February,
in a case that is setting Armenia on a collision course with leading
European institutions.
Few
in Armenia doubt what the outcome of the politically charged proceedings
will be: a death penalty for prime suspect Nairi Hunanian and his main
accomplices. The key question seems to be whether such a verdict would
ever be carried out.
Armenia
has conducted no executions since 1990, when an unofficial moratorium on
the death penalty began. The punishment is due to be formally outlawed
under the terms of Armenia's new membership in the Council of Europe. But
the country's politicians -- including members of the governing coalition
-- insist the ban should not extend to the case of the parliamentary
murders.
The
ruling Miasnutyun (Unity) bloc, which was co-founded by the slain premier
and speaker, is particularly eager to see the jailed gunmen put to death.
Galust Sahakian, the chairman of the bloc's parliamentary faction, says
simply:
"This
was an unprecedented crime, and nobody can teach us a lesson in that
regard."
It's
a view that is shared by virtually all voices in parliament and is
increasingly promoted by the media. The Council of Europe, however, has
been quick to offer a stern response. An official delegation from
Strasbourg visited Yerevan last week and delivered a strong and explicit
message: Armenia must make no exceptions to the death penalty ban or risk
losing its Council membership.
Pietro
Ago is Italy's permanent representative to the Council of Europe and head
of the ad hoc "Ago group" monitoring Armenia's and Azerbaijan's
compliance with their membership commitments. Speaking at a news
conference in the Armenian capital, he warned:
"If
there is a sentence that gives the death penalty but that is commuted --
that will be bad, but not terrible. But if there will be an execution,
that could precipitate a crisis in relations between the Council of Europe
and Armenia, and could bring the [Council's] Parliamentary Assembly to
suspend the participation of Armenia."
In
January, when the Armenian government joined the prestigious Council, it
signed the 1953 European Convention on Human Rights, including Protocol
No. 6, which prohibits capital punishment. It undertook to make
corresponding changes in the Armenian criminal code within a year.
But
with the overwhelming majority of lawmakers pushing for the execution of
the parliament assailants, meeting this goal now appears problematic. Much
will depend on the position of President Robert Kocharian, who has yet to
make a public statement on the issue. Ago said his group received
assurances by Kocharian that no one will be executed under his rule.
But
the Armenian leader has already been accused by supporters and relatives
of the murdered officials of withholding the truth about the parliament
bloodbath. Some of them still suspect Kocharian of orchestrating the
murders with the aim of removing powerful political rivals. So any attempt
to prevent the gunmen's execution would be portrayed by his opponents as
support for terrorism.
Yet
failure to honor international obligations could be highly damaging for
Kocharian's drive to forge closer ties with Europe, which has been at the
forefront of a global campaign against capital punishment. Last month
Armenia, Russia, and Turkey were cited by Council of Europe Secretary-
General Walter Schwimmer as the only European states where the practice is
still legal.
Top
politicians who had for years sought to persuade Strasbourg officials of
Armenia's European credentials, now claim the Armenian people are not yet
prepared to embrace all European norms. Avetik Ishkhanian of the Armenian
Helsinki Association, a human rights group opposed to the death penalty,
says this backtracking only betrays the politicians' hypocrisy:
"Our
so-called elite wants to cunningly fool the Council of Europe and enjoy
all benefits of membership, while ignoring conditions set by the latter.
They want to have their way by succumbing to their sense of revenge."
Many
Armenian officials seem to support the idea that the nature of the crime
justifies the use of capital punishment and other human rights violations.
Responding
to allegations that the murder suspects have been tortured while in police
custody, parliament speaker Gagik Aslanian argued in a newspaper article
that Hunanian and the other gunmen can be mistreated in custody because
they are "beyond the law."
Many
Armenians are in agreement. There have been no opinion polls to gauge
popular opinion on the death penalty. But there are signs that Armenians
are opposed to the ban on capital punishment, particularly in the case of
the parliament murders.
For
the dozens of people who regularly gather outside a Yerevan courthouse,
justice in the 1999 case means nothing short of death for Hunanian and his
henchman -- even at the cost of Armenia's Council membership.
Hovannes
Nahapetian is a doctor from Ararat, the hometown of the late prime
minister, Vazgen Sarkisian. He says there is only 1 option for dealing
with the parliamentary gunmen:
"The
death penalty, only the death penalty. Those who killed Vazgen must be
executed in front of the Armenian people. This is what we want. This is
our goal."
The
arguments cited by European officials and local human rights groups are
unlikely to make citizens like Nahapetian change their views. For that
reason, says Ishkhanian of the Armenian Helsinki Association, it falls to
the country's leaders to always be "one step ahead of public
opinion." But he adds that seems unlikely to happen in Armenia.
|