NO alla Pena di Morte
Campagna Internazionale 

pdm_s.gif (3224 byte)





Death penalty Information Center

U.S. Supreme Court Will Hear Virginia Case to Decide Constitutionality of Executing Inmates with Mental Retardation

    The U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the case of North Carolina death row inmate Ernest McCarver, which they had taken to decide the issue of whether it is cruel and unusual to execute inmates with mental retardation.  Instead, the Court will hear the case of Daryl Atkins, a Virginia death row inmate with mental retardation.  After the Justices had agreed to review McCarver's case, North Carolina passed a bill prohibiting the execution of the mentally retarded, rendering McCarver's case moot.   

     In 1989, the Supreme Court held that executing persons with mental retardation was not a violation of the Eighth Amendment because a "national consensus" had not developed against executing those with mental retardation.  At the time, only two states prohibited such executions.  Since then, 16 more states and the federal government have enacted laws prohibiting the execution of the mentally retarded. 


- September 25

Court Reviews Executing Mentally

By GINA HOLLAND

WASHINGTON  - The Supreme Court has reaffirmed its intention to decide if mentally retarded killers should be spared the death penalty, choosing a new case to review.

As state leaders debate the morality of the practice, the court will consider early next year if it is constitutional.

The court on Tuesday substituted a moot North Carolina inmate's case with one from Virginia. The court's first choice had been the appeal of Ernest McCarver, convicted of killing a cafeteria worker. North Carolina enacted a ban on such executions last month.

 ``Obviously they do want to take a stand on this issue, one way or the other,'' said Paula Bernstein, spokeswoman for the Death Penalty Information Center.

 The court will review the case of Daryl Atkins, who was 18 when he was accused of murdering an airman to get money for beer. Justices will revisit the question of whether it is cruel and unusual punishment to execute a person with mental retardation.

 Atkins has an IQ of 59, the court was told. People who test 70 or below are generally considered mentally retarded. A psychologist who testified for the state said that Atkins used sophisticated words and was able to identify the last two presidents as well as Virginia's governor.

 The victim in the Atkins case, 21-year-old Eric Nesbitt, was kidnapped in 1996 outside a convenience store and forced to withdraw money from an automatic teller machine. Atkins and an accomplice were accused of taking Nesbitt to a deserted field and shooting him eight times. Nesbitt was stationed at Langley Air Force Base in Hampton, Va.

 Pro-death penalty groups said they would oppose Atkins' case.

``Our participation in this case will be to help assure that cold-blooded murderers are not able to avoid the punishment they have earned with an unsupported claim that they suffer a mental deficiency,'' said Kent Scheidegger, legal director for the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation.

 In 1989, the year the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution allowed the execution of killers with mental retardation, only two states - Georgia and Maryland - and the federal government banned those executions. Now 18 states forbid them.

 Steven Hawkins, executive director of the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, said state policy makers have been giving the issue more attention and the court may respond to that trend.

 Virginia prosecutors said that although Atkins mentioned his claim that he is mentally retarded in his appeal to the state Supreme Court, he did not argue that it was grounds to overturn his death sentence.

 Atkins revised his U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites) appeal after justices announced in March that they would review the McCarver case.

 President Bush (news - web sites) has said he opposes executing the retarded.

 ``We should never execute anybody who is retarded,'' Bush said in June. ``And our court system protects people who don't understand the nature of the crime they committed.''

 That same month, his brother, Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, signed a ban into law for Florida while Bush's successor in Texas, Gov. Rick Perry, vetoed a similar proposal.

 The Death Penalty Information Center said that Texas has executed six retarded defendants since 1982, two of them while President Bush was governor.

 Prosecutors have disputed that, contending that the two men put to death during Bush's years as governor both tested higher on some IQ tests.

 The cases are McCarver v. North Carolina, 00-8727, and Atkins v. Virginia, 00-8452.