The Year in
Death: 2001
January 1,
2002
THE
YEAR 2001 saw the continuation of what now appears to be a dramatic decline
in the use of the death penalty in America. In 1999, 98 people were put to
death. That number fell to 85 in 2000. But in the year just past, according
to data from the Death Penalty Information Center, 66 people were executed.
Texas, which has the dubious distinction of leading the nation in
state-sponsored killing, cut executions by more than half (from 40 in 2000
to 17 in 2001) and lost the lead to Oklahoma, which executed 18 convicts in
2001. The top five death penalty states in 2001 -- Oklahoma, Texas,
Missouri (7), North Carolina (5) and Georgia (4) -- accounted for 77
percent of executions. But no other state -- including Virginia, with its
historically hyperactive death chamber -- executed more than two people.
The
decline is an encouraging development for death penalty opponents. But
caution is warranted. The decrease is only partly the result of a changing
political climate. True, a combination of declining crime rates and a
continuing wave of DNA exonerations has made the public and the courts more
skeptical of death sentences. And demographic quirks in the death row
population have played a significant, perhaps even predominant, role. But
the climate could easily shift back. Now that it's faltering, the booming
economy, which presumably facilitated the decrease in crime over the past
several years, could end up pushing crime rates in precisely the opposite
direction. Views on capital punishment and the need to deal with terrorists
with the firmest of hands also may have been hardened by the Sept. 11
attacks. Without systematic reform at both the state and federal levels --
something that has begun but is far from complete -- the current favorable
trend in death penalty use could easily take a turn for the worse.
Unfortunately, one disturbing counter-trend has already
been seen. In 2001, the federal government began executing people again,
for the first time in decades. Shifting the federal death penalty into gear
at exactly the time federal authorities ought to be pushing states to
reform their own systems sends the wrong message. This problem will only
grow worse if federal terrorism trials become common. Pressure in those
cases for the death penalty may be even stronger than in routine criminal
cases. It is, therefore, all the more critical to remember why capital
punishment must be abolished. The death penalty doesn't deter crime -- much
less terrorism. It is a capricious act toward human life on the state's
part. And it can produce disastrous, irreversible errors
|