US
clears drug cure for killers on death row
Convicted
murderers with severe mental health problems can be forced to take drugs that
would make them clinically sane so that they can be executed, the US supreme
court has ruled.
Opponents
of the death penalty yesterday described the court's decision to uphold an
earlier ruling on the issue - without debating it - as shocking.
The
case concerns Charles Singleton who, in 1979, killed a grocery shop worker in
Arkansas. He was convicted and sentenced to death later that year.
While
awaiting execution, Singleton's mental health deteriorated to such an extent
that he believed his victim was still alive, that the authorities had implanted
a device in his ear and that his jail cell was under the control of demons.
Because
a prisoner has to be technically sane before being executed, the court was asked
to decide whether Singleton could be given psychotropic drugs to qualify to be
put to death. His lawyers argued that the drugs should not be administered as
the only medical purpose of doing so would be to prepare the prisoner for
execution.
This
year an appeals court in St Louis ruled that it was acceptable to give Singleton
the drugs, although the decision was not unanimous. A dissenting judge, Gerald
Heaney, said: "I believe that to execute a man who is severely deranged
without treatment and arguably incompetent when treated is the pinnacle of ...
the barbarity of exacting mindless vengeance." At issue is whether such
action amounts to "cruel and unusual punishment" under the American
constitution. In 1986 the supreme court ruled that it was cruel and unusual to
execute someone if they did not know why they were being executed or even that
they were about to be executed.
Another
crucial concern is whether a doctor would administer the drug and what the
ethical implications would be for the doctor. The ruling could mean that
paramedics would have to be specially trained to give the medication.
Richard
Dieter, the executive director of the Death Penalty Information Centre in
Washington, said yesterday that because the supreme court had upheld the
decision without a debate the door was open for a further appeal.
"It
is somewhat shocking that someone whose mental condition is so bad that you have
to pump them up, so to speak, so that you can put them on the table [is allowed
to be executed]," Mr Dieter said. "It seems to be the epitome of cruel
punishment and the invasion of the human body.
"I
hope at some time there will be a debate [in the supreme court] and I hope that
this will get a full hearing."
Mr
Dieter said he was aware of only 3 or 4 prisoners who had been spared the death
penalty because they were considered mentally incompetent. Many people on death
row suffered from mental illness of some sort, ranging from depression and
alcoholism to schizophrenia, but this did not often prevent their execution.
"I
read a lot of mitigating circumstances and mental illness is often part of the
description," Mr Dieter said.
In
a separate death penalty dispute, there is growing debate about the lethal
injection itself.
Medical
experts have argued that while a person being executed may appear serene, it is
possible they are in severe pain but unable to cry out because they have been
paralysed. A case brought by a prisoner awaiting execution claims that
pancuronium bromide, the chemical compound used in some states, leaves the
prisoner conscious but unable to communicate.
Lethal
injection is now the favoured method of execution in states which permit the
punishment. Nebraska, which electrocutes prisoners sentenced to death, is the
only one of the 38 states which have the death penalty not to use the method. In
some states the prisoner is given a choice, which can include a firing squad (in
Utah), a gas chamber or hanging.
|