<<<<  Back

 

Home Page
Moratoria

 

Signature On-Line

 

Urgent Appeals

 

The commitment of the Community of Sant'Egidio

 

Abolitions, 
commutations,
moratoria, ...

 

Archives News  IT  EN

 

Comunit� di Sant'Egidio


News

 

Informations   @

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
NO alla Pena di Morte
Campagna Internazionale
Comunità di Sant'Egidio

 

TERRORISMO: GUANTANAMO; GB RINUNCIA A BATTAGLIA PER DETENUTI

LONDRA,  - I ministri di Londra si sono rassegnati alla prospettiva che i due britannici detenuti a Guantanamo non potranno essere rimpatriati per essere processati e saranno dunque costretti ad affrontare il tribunale militare americano nel campo Usa a Cuba. E' quanto scrive oggi il quotidiano The Guardian, osservando che le barriere legali per un compromesso politico del genere sembrano essere insormontabili.

La vicenda rischia pero' di mettere seriamente in imbarazzo il premier Tony Blair, in partenza questa settimana per Washington, sempre piu' sotto pressione da parte della famiglia di uno dei due uomini e dell'opinione pubblica.

I britannici (Moazzam Begg e Feroz Abbasi) sono tra i sei prigionieri - trattenuti da 18 mesi nel carcere americano senza poter comunicare con nessuno - che dovranno affrontare per primi un tribunale militare. Se dovessero dichiararsi non colpevoli, rischiano la pena di morte per presunti reati terroristici.

Un ex ministro britannico, definito dal quotodiano come vicino all' Amministrazione americana, ha dichiarato che Washington gli ha spiegato di non poter rimandare i detenuti nel Regno Unito perche' li' ''non ci sono le leggi per perseguirli'' e ''non siamo disposti a lasciarli andare''.


BRITAIN: Brit suspects stay in Guantanamo

Britain has abandoned attempts to have its suspects detained by US authorities at Guantanamo Bay repatriated to Britain to stand trial, the Guardian newspaper reported on Tuesday.

Senior ministers believed the legal barriers to trial in Britain were insurmountable, the left-liberal newspaper said without naming the sources for its information.

It said the outcome was an embarrassment to Prime Minister Tony Blair who leaves for the United States on Thursday to hold talks with President George W Bush and to address a joint session of Congress.

There have been reports in the British media that US officials had considered repatriating two British al-Qaeda suspects earmarked for trial by a US military tribunal, but that discussions had come to nothing because of the lack of an appropriate law under which they could be prosecuted.

An English court could also query why the men had been held for so long without appearing before a court or having access to lawyers of their own choice.

According to the Guardian, a former minister with close military and political contacts in the United States was adamant he was told in Washington: "We would be happy to send these guys back, but you have no law to prosecute them. We are not going to just let them go."

Last week Blair's office said it was holding discussions with the US over Feroz Abbasi and Moazzam Begg, two British Muslims seized in Afghanistan and Pakistan respectively and held at the high security base in Cuba.

Abbasi and Begg are among 6 Britons held at the base.

They are among the 1st group, which includes Australian David Hicks, who will face a military tribunal which has the power to impose the death penalty.

Begg, 35, was detained in Pakistan in February 2002 and held in Afghanistan for a year before being taken to the base in Cuba.

Abbasi, 22, was arrested in Afghanistan in January 2002.

Blair has come under pressure regarding the men from members of his own Labour Party. More than 200 members of parliament from all parties have signed a motion calling for the men to be given a fair trial.

On Monday, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw renewed his call for the suspected British terrorists to be given a fair trial.

"It is not acceptable for them to be tried if they are not given basic principles of human rights and fair trial," he said.

Straw said discussions with the US authorities "about a range of options" were continuing, ranging from trial in Britain through to trial by military commission if it was consistent with the "rules of justice and human rights".